Jeff Borchardt -we don't want to have to give you advice on how to hide your maulers after they have attacked.

Jeff Borchardt

17 hrs

Well, well, well...would you look at this. Child protective services was called on Ms. "They say it can't be done."

Like · Share

• 25 people like this.
• 52 of 83

  View previous comments
• 

  Nicole Marie here's the thing- it would be bad if these were any large, powerful breed of dog. kid is tiny and holding their food. she could get really hurt simply by them just plowing her into the cabinets or the floor. the fact that they're pits just adds to the level of risk in this. if these were Great Danes or any large dogs, I'd still call cps on her

  16 hrs · Like · 13
• 

  Jeff Borchardt Gail Sizemore Sarah it says CPS was called because one of the dogs stepped on her foot when they walked over....They won't even adopt to parents with pit bulls.

  16 hrs · Like · 9
• 

  Jewel-Joseph Ishmael They'll get out of it. At least some steps are being made.

  16 hrs · Like · 2
• 

  Venishia Corbin I hope they take all the dogs!

  16 hrs · Like · 5
• 

  Jackie Jenkins

  

  16 hrs · Like · 1
• 

  Jeff Borchardt Absolutely agree Nicole Marie

  16 hrs · Like · 2
• 

  Jackie Jenkins

  

  16 hrs · Like · 1
• 

  Jaime Brunkan SIX pit bulls eating off the kitchen floor? Surely there's a max number of dogs someone can own and how many are behind the baby gate leading into the kitchen? My Lord.

  16 hrs · Like · 7
• 

  Jackie Jenkins Exactly I was within a conversation where several advocates we're damning this video

  16 hrs · Like · 2
• 

  Jeff Borchardt Not ALL pro-pit groups Lynne Smith.

  

  16 hrs · Like · 2
• 

  Jeff Borchardt Apparently this pro-pit group disagrees with other pro-pit groups. So much pro-pitting going on lately, I don't know WHO to believe Lynne Smith

  

  16 hrs · Like · 2
• 

  Jackie Jenkins There are two sides to the advocacy I'm finding out, those who are sensible, those who think their dogs should be able to do no wrong

  16 hrs · Like · 3
• 

  Jeff Borchardt So Lynne Smith, are you telling me that some pro-pit groups agree with us?

  

  16 hrs · Like · 1
• 

  Jeff Borchardt

  

  16 hrs · Like · 5
• 

  Jeff Borchardt I'm being sarcastic Lynne Smith. You are a genius as usual. 

  16 hrs · Like · 5
• 

  Jeff Borchardt Eddie!!!

  16 hrs · Like
• 

  Jeff Borchardt You mean like this Lynne Smith?...LOL!

  

  16 hrs · Like · 3
• 

  Jeff Borchardt There's a kimberlythesanddog blog being written as we speak.

  16 hrs · Like · 1
• 

  Jeff Borchardt Women Stalked and Harassed by Jeff D Borchardt reports. *drumroll

  16 hrs · Like · 3
• 

  Jackie Jenkins Well that's at least a sensible statement, compared to usual they are harmless sweet wiggle butt statements

  16 hrs · Like · 1
• 

  Jeff Borchardt This is the result of their advocacy:https://maultalk.wordpress.com/.../so-sorry-for-your.../

  

  "So sorry for your loss … BUT"

  This term refers to a branch of Pit Sociopaths. Zealous pit bull advocates (Nutters), who comment on mauling...

  MAULTALK.WORDPRESS.COM

  16 hrs · Like · 6
• 

  Jeff Borchardt And yes Nancy, "Sorry for your loss, HOWEVER" is the same thing. Did you catch that Women Stalked and Harassed by Jeff D Borchardt? Wouldn't want you to miss anything. https://maultalk.wordpress.com/.../so-sorry-for-your.../

  

  16 hrs · Edited · Like · 1
• 

  Jeff Borchardt

  
  
•  Funny how they think the AFF controlled 
• NCRC is the authority on dog bite statistics because they 
• are "peer reviewed" by other DOGGIE people. Yet fly off 
• the handle and say DogsBite.org is not credible when 
• Colleen's data is peer reviewed by the over 100 year old 
• Annals Of Surgery made up of HUMAN DOCTOR 
• people.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475022

  

  Pit Bull Attacks - Advocating for Victims of Dangerous Dog Attacks

  Learn about victims of severe pit bull attacks and other...

  DOGSBITE.ORG
• 

  Jeff Borchardt

  

  15 hrs · Like · 2
• 

  Jeff Borchardt In upholding Denver’s pit bull ban in 1991, the Supreme Court of Colorado wrote, “The city, however, is not required to meet its burden of proof with mathematical certainty of scientific evidence,” when identifying a pit bull.2 Death investigation reports prepared by police and medical examiners are sufficient to determine dog breed. 
  Source: The Colorado Dog Fanciers, Inc. et al. v. The City and County of Denver, 820 P. 2d 644 (Colo.1991)

  15 hrs · Like · 3
• 

  Jeff Borchardt In Ohio the Supreme Court wrote a decision in the state of Ohio v. Anderson that used the words over and over "a dog owner of ordinary intelligence can identify a pit bull." http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case...
  Here is a quote " In sum, we reject the appellee's contention that the phrase "commonly known as a pit bull dog" is so devoid of meaning that R.C. 955.11(A)(4)(a)(iii) is unconstitutionally void for vagueness. Pit bull dogs possess unique and readily identifiable physical and behavioral traits which are capable of recognition both by dog owners of ordinary intelligence and by enforcement personnel. Consistent and detailed descriptions of the pit bull dog may be found in canine guidebooks, general reference books, statestatutes and local ordinances, and state and federal case law dealing with pit bull legislation. By reference to these sources, a dog owner of ordinary intelligence can determine if he does in fact own a dog commonly known as a pit bull dog within the meaning of R.C. 955.11 (A)(4)(a)(iii). Similarly, by reference to these sources, dog wardens, police officers, judges, and juries can enforce the statute fairly and evenhandedly. Consequently, we find that R.C. 955.11(A)(4)(a)(iii) is not unconstitutionally void for vagueness. "
  
  Toledo v. Tellings covers the ID issue as well as constitutionality, this is also a state Supreme Court ruling. 
  http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case...

  Error 404 (Not Found)!!1

  SCHOLAR.GOOGLE.COM

  15 hrs · Like · 3
• 

  Jeff Borchardt http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case...

  Google Scholar

  John T. Madigan, Toledo Acting Law Director, Adam Loukx, General Counsel, and Joseph Howe and Daniel R. Pilrose Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.

  SCHOLAR.GOOGLE.COM

  15 hrs · Like · 2
• 

  Jeff Borchardt http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case...

  Google Scholar

  The question presented in this appeal is whether R.C. 955.11(A)(4)(a)(iii) is constitutional under the Due Process Clauses of the state and federal Constitutions. R.C. 955.11(A)(4)(a)(iii) provides in pertinent part:

  SCHOLAR.GOOGLE.COM

  15 hrs · Like · 3
• 

  Jeff Borchardt Yeah. Here at The Lexus Project, Legal Defense for Dogs, we don't want to have to give you advice on how to hide your maulers after they have attacked.

  

  15 hrs · Like · 4
• 

  Jeff Borchardt Let me know if I'm stalking a woman at The Lexus Project, Legal Defense for Dogs....Sound good Women Stalked and Harassed by Jeff D Borchardt?

  15 hrs · Like · 3
• 

  Jaime Brunkan What a trainwreck over on the Lexus Project page....wow!

  15 hrs · Like · 6
• 

  Sarah Renee Gouge-Banner I am offended that she would cite the Nuremburg laws and even compare her life one iota to what the Jews went through. The only Night of Broken Glass she will have to go through is when her stupid dogs smash some. Her Whole manner is offensive and it is obvious she cares more about her pets than her child...mother of the year, I nominate her for the Mommy Dearest Joan Crawford award.

  14 hrs · Edited · Like · 9
• 

  Rachel Q Acosta She's more worried about the continued advocacy of her favorite breed than losing her children wow.

  13 hrs · Like · 7
• 

  Laila Brunet The pit nutter at its FINEST! "I have to say that this is a case of PITBULL DISCRIMINATION. This is harassment at its best". Are you kidding me??? this IS endangering a child. Morons.

  45 mins · Like